The 6 different types of solar panels

Solar-technology
Last updated on 9 May 20247 min read

Discover the six main types of solar panel, including monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin-film.

Photo of solar panel writer Josh Jackman against blank background

Written byJosh Jackman

A monocrystalline solar panel next to a polycrystalline solar panel with a yellow question mark in the middle

🏆 Monocrystalline solar panels have the best efficiency and longest lifespan

🌞 Thin-film panels are a good, low-cost option for mobile homes

🖤 The most popular type of solar panel in the UK is monocrystalline

When you’re considering whether to get solar panels, it’s a good idea to look into all the different types, to ensure you choose the best system for your home.

In this guide, we’ll run through all the main types of solar panels, their advantages and disadvantages, and which panels make the most sense for different purposes.

We’ll also take a look at new and developing solar panel technology, and explain which type of panel is the best overall.

To learn how much a solar & battery system could save you on your energy bills, click the button below and answer a few quick questions.

How many types of solar panel are there?

The six main types of solar panels are polycrystalline, monocrystalline, thin-film, transparent, solar tiles, and perovskite.

Type of solar panel Average efficiency Typical lifespan (years) Key advantage Key disadvantage
Polycrystalline 13-16% 25-30 Cheaper than monocrystalline Less efficient than monocrystalline
Monocrystalline 18-24% 25-40 Most efficient type available More expensive than polycrystalline
Thin-film 7-13% 10-20 Most flexible option Low power output
Transparent 1-10% 25-35 Blends in with windows Low efficiency
Solar tiles 10-20% 25-30 Blends in with roofs Very expensive
Perovskite Up to 25% 25-35 Highest efficiency Not yet available

Polycrystalline solar panels

Multiple polycrystalline solar panels, side by side

  • 13-16% efficiency
  • Lifespan of 25-30 years

Polycrystalline solar panels are one of the oldest types of solar panel in existence.

These blue panels, with cells that are made by melting multiple silicon crystals and combining them in a square mould, are less efficient, less aesthetically pleasing, and less long-lasting than black monocrystalline panels.

And though they’re technically cheaper, this comes with a large drawback: they take up far more space.

Polycrystalline panels are 31% less efficient than monocrystalline panels, on average, which means, to achieve a certain level of output, you'll need a higher number of polycrystalline panels than you would monocrystalline panels.

When considering the lifetime cost of solar panels, it’s almost always better to cover your roof with as many panels as you can, to generate the most electricity possible – and polycrystalline panels won’t get the best out of your roof space.

Pros and cons of polycrystalline solar panels

Pros
Cons
Cheaper than monocrystalline panels
Lower return on investment
Widely available
Not aesthetically pleasing
More eco-friendly manufacturing process
Relatively mediocre efficiency
No longer sold by most top companies
Shorter lifespan than monocrystalline

Monocrystalline solar panels

Black monocrystalline solar panels on a grey roof, under a blue sky

  • 18-24% efficiency
  • Lifespan of 25-40 years

Monocrystalline solar panels are the most efficient type of solar panel currently on the market.

The top monocrystalline panels now all come with 22% efficiency or higher, and manufacturers are continually raising this bar.

These sleek, black panels are made from single-crystal silicon – hence their name and dark appearance – and treated with anti-reflective coating that removes their grey undertones, making them look even darker.

They also have a longer lifespan than any other type, on average, often outlasting their already lengthy performance warranties, which can stretch to 30 years.

Monocrystalline is currently the most cutting-edge solar material, too – bifacial solar panels are usually made with monocrystalline, for instance.

Pros and cons of monocrystalline solar panels

Pros
Cons
Very efficient
More expensive than polycrystalline
Sleek appearance
Longer lifespan than polycrystalline

On average, monocrystalline solar panels are 31% more efficient than their closest rival, last around 18% longer, and are produced by all the leading solar manufacturers.

The only major drawback when it comes to monocrystalline panels is they’re usually more expensive than other widely available types – but if you can afford them, they’re typically worth it.

And if you opt for Sunsave Plus, you’ll avoid paying anything upfront.

Thin-film solar panels

MIPV Solar's thin-film black solar panel

(Source: MIPV Solar)

  • 7-13% efficiency
  • Lifespan of 10-20 years

Thin-film solar panels are flexible sheets that can wrap around objects, making them perfect for properties with a limited amount of unobstructed roof space, or mobile homes like recreation vehicles and houseboats.

They’re thousands of times thinner than the average monocrystalline panel, which gives them their malleable nature.

Manufacturers create them by stacking several layers of solar material, like amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, and copper indium gallium selenide. 

Depending on which combination of materials they use, the end product’s efficiency rating can be anywhere from 7% to 13%.

This is substantially lower than most other types of solar panels, though this fact is usually reflected in their relatively low prices.

However, since demand isn’t particularly high for thin-film panels, the amount you pay will mostly come down to who your local supplier is.

Pros and cons of thin-film solar panels

Pros
Cons
Perfect for uneven surfaces
Low efficiency
Cheap
Middling lifespan
Subtle appearance
Not widely available
Can’t power a house

If you’re wondering how much a solar & battery system could save you, answer a few quick questions below and we’ll provide you with an estimate.

Transparent solar panels

Transparent solar panels on a building, with the sky and other buildings in the background

  • 1-10% efficiency
  • Lifespan of 25-35 years

If they reach their final form, transparent solar panels will be fully see-through sheets of solar material, mostly made of glass, that replace windows, roofs, and phone screens all over the world.

Right now, they’re behind other models in the industry.

These potentially ground-breaking creations are 30-40% transparent and severely lacking on the efficiency front, where they’re typically around five times worse than monocrystalline panels.

A handful of locations around the UK have used them, such as Gloucestershire County's Council Hall, Bournemouth University, and the Barbican Theatre in London, but unless their efficiency rises dramatically, they won’t be suitable for domestic properties.

Instead, they’re better used on large office blocks or even skyscrapers, where the sheer number of windows they can replace will produce enormous energy savings.

Pros and cons of transparent solar panels

Pros
Cons
Solid lifespan
Low efficiency
Great for commercial & public buildings
Not suitable for homes
Ground-breaking concept
Currently only 30-40% transparent

Solar tiles

A detached house with solar tiles on every roof, surrounded by gardens and trees, under a blue sky

(Source: XO Solar)

  • 10-20% efficiency
  • Lifespan of 25-30 years

Solar tiles produce electricity in the same way as monocrystalline or polycrystalline panels, but they’re built to replace all your roof tiles.

For people who are worried that panels will look unsightly on their roof, or who are struggling to get planning permission in a listed building or conservation area, solar tiles might be a solution – but they come at a price.

The process of replacing every tile with a solar one is typically around 50% more expensive than a monocrystalline solar panel system, roughly 30% less efficient, and takes about three times longer.

They should last 25-30 years, which is decent, but since they were only introduced to the UK market in the decade or so, there are no guarantees.

Pros and cons of solar tiles

Pros
Cons
Aesthetic appearance
Extremely expensive
Birds can’t nest underneath
Longer installation
Can sidestep most planning permission issues
Mediocre efficiency
Middling lifespan

Perovskite solar panels

Scientist holding a perovskite-silicon tandem solar module (Oxford PV)

(Source: Oxford PV)

  • Up to 25% efficiency
  • Lifespan of 25-35 years

These panels are at the forefront of solar innovation.

They’re made with perovskite, a synthetic material based on the crystal structure of a mineral that’s (confusingly) also called perovskite.

A layer of this material is placed on a layer of silicon to create a ‘tandem’ panel – the advantage being that silicon can absorb light from the red part of the spectrum, and perovskite can absorb light from the blue end.

The results so far have been extremely exciting. In 2023, researchers at the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in Saudi Arabia created a perovskite-silicon cell with a record-breaking 33.7% efficiency.

And in January 2024, the UK’s Oxford PV broke the record for an entire panel with a model that has a 25% efficiency rating.

These panels aren’t currently commercially available though, and if they do arrive on the market, they’ll likely be very expensive.

To learn more, check out our full guide to perovskite solar panels.

Pros and cons of perovskite solar panels

Pros
Cons
The highest efficiency of any panel
Not commercially available
Good lifespan
Will probably be expensive
Black appearance, like monocrystalline

What’s the best type of solar panel?

The best type of solar panel is monocrystalline.

They’re more efficient than any other panel currently on the market, meaning you’ll be making the best use of your roof space.

And they have longer lifespans than all their competitors, which boosts their return on investment beyond that of polycrystalline panels or solar tiles.

At some point in the next few years, perovskite panels may take over as the best type, but first they have to become widely available – and cheap enough to be worth the investment.

What’s the best type of solar panel for you?

The best type of solar panel for the majority of households is monocrystalline, as they’re the most efficient, long-lasting, and cost-effective panel available right now.

However, if you live in a listed building or conservation area and can’t get planning permission for on-roof panels, solar tiles may be the answer – but they’re much more expensive.

If you’re looking to put solar panels on a mobile home instead of a house, you’ll probably want to go with thin-film panels, which suit the less flat and sturdy roofs of caravans, houseboats, and recreational vehicles.

New types of solar panels

There are multiple types of solar panels that could revolutionise the market.

Here are the most intriguing examples:

  • Quantum dot solar cells
  • Zombie solar cells
  • Organic photovoltaics

Quantum dot solar cells

Quantum dots are tiny balls made from semiconducting nanocrystals that could replace all the relatively bulkier semiconducting material that goes into modern solar panels.

They’re also known as artificial atoms because of their size, which is just a few nanometres – or roughly 338 million times smaller than the average Brit.

These nanoscopic dots absorb much more of the light the sun sends – including ultraviolet light – which could massively expand a solar panel’s efficiency, all the way up to 66%.

As a result, they could be the driving force behind considerably lighter, more effective solar technology at some point in the future. Currently, the efficiency record of a quantum dot solar cell is 18.1% – so there’s a way to go.

Zombie solar cells

Zombie solar cells came from the realisation that a burgeoning solar technology called dye-sensitised solar cells can continue functioning after their assumed death – and even better than they did before.

Normally, these cells use a dye compound that absorbs light and sends electrons to be gathered by a liquid electrolyte and turned into electric current.

But when scientists replaced the liquid electrolyte with a dry version, it produced more electricity, to the extent that zombie cells have reached 30-34% efficiency.

Smart zombie solar cells are also in development, which can absorb indoor light and turn it into electricity.

Organic photovoltaics

Organic solar cells generate electricity in the same way as standard panels, but they use organic semiconductors instead of silicon.

Panels using this organic material, which usually consists of carbon-based polymers, have reached 19.3% efficiency so far, but are still near the start of their development process.

Using organic semiconductors would make panels lighter, more flexible, able to absorb a larger part of the electromagnetic light spectrum, and more sustainable.

Solar panel types: FAQs

Which type of solar panel is best?

Monocrystalline solar panels are the best type of solar panel for residential installations. They’re usually between 18-23% efficient, and they have a sleek, black appearance that can blend in with a lot of roof types. 

You’ll typically pay more for monocrystalline solar panels than you would for polycrystalline, but your electricity generation and electricity bill savings will be substantially higher.

What type of solar panel is the most efficient?

The most efficient commercially available solar panel is a monocrystalline solar panel, which has an average efficiency rating of 18-23%. 

Perovskite solar panels have been known to achieve efficiencies over 30%, but they are not yet commercially available.

What's the newest type of solar panel?

There are many new types of solar panels emerging on the scene, but none of them are available for residential installations. 

Zombie solar cells, quantum dot solar cells and organic photovoltaics are all exciting innovations in the world of solar, and would be capable of significantly expanding the practical uses of solar energy. Perovskite solar cells are presenting the most impressive efficiency rates in lab tests, but they are not available for rooftop installation.

Can you mix different types of solar panels?

You can absolutely mix different types of solar panels, but it takes some planning to ensure you still get the most electricity out of your system.

As long as the voltage and current of the panels aren’t too dissimilar, your output shouldn’t be overly affected.

The general rule is that the difference in these two categories should be less than 25%.

However, we wouldn’t usually recommend buying different types of solar panels. The best course of action is almost always to find the most efficient panel available to you, and get the highest number of that model you can fit on your roof, at the cheapest price possible.

And if you add more solar panels at a later date, you’ll most likely need another inverter and consequently have to track your system on two different apps – which would be very inconvenient.

What’s the most common type of solar panel?

The most common type of solar panel in the UK is monocrystalline.

While installers used to favour polycrystalline panels – which explains why you’ll see blue solar arrays all over the country – black monocrystalline panels have quickly become the most popular type.

Most of the 163,000 solar panel systems installed in 2023 were monocrystalline, as the UK moved decisively towards these more efficient, more stylish panels.

Related articles

Black solar panels on a rooftop, a cartoon yellow sun rising behind it, turquoise background

Why are black solar panels better than blue?

Photo of author Melody AbeniMelody Abeni
A faded blue solar on the left, a black solar panel in the centre, and a yellow question mark with black outline on the right. They're all under a black horizontal line with yellow dots above the icons, and against an aquamarine background

How quickly are solar panels improving?

Photo of solar panel writer Josh Jackman against blank backgroundJosh Jackman
A hand holding up a small perovskite solar cell, with a cartoon yellow information booklet to the right of the hand

Perovskite solar panels: an expert guide

Photo of author Melody AbeniMelody Abeni
Photo of solar panel writer Josh Jackman against blank background

Written byJosh Jackman

Josh has written about the rapid rise of home solar for the past five years. His data-driven work has been featured in United Nations and World Health Organisation documents, as well as publications including The Eco Experts, Financial Times, The Independent, The Telegraph, The Times, and The Sun. Josh has also been interviewed as a renewables expert on BBC One’s Rip-Off Britain, ITV1’s Tonight show, and BBC Radio 4 and 5.

Copyright © 2024 Sunsave

Sunsave Group Limited (company number: 13741813) and its affiliates, Sunsave UK Limited (company number: 13941186) and Sunsave Energy Limited (company number: 13952135), together trading as “Sunsave”, provide renewable energy systems and finance and are registered at 23 Ansdell Terrace, London, W8 5BY. Sunsave Energy Limited (FRN: 979494) is a lender authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Sunsave UK Limited (FRN: 977566) acts as a credit broker and can introduce you to a panel of lenders for the purpose of arranging finance. Sunsave UK Limited is an appointed representative of Product Partnerships Limited (FRN: 626349) which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and registered at Suite D2 Josephs Well, Hanover Walk, Leeds, LS3 1AB.